From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 8 15:24:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D90616A500 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 15:24:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF98913C44C for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 15:24:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E48151937 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 11:24:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 16:24:46 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070608162446.4acdb0c0@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <70f41ba20706052031q10aff72cy93a8e2e14728d945@mail.gmail.com> References: <70f41ba20706041403q1d51ac75jee625130ea4ed10@mail.gmail.com> <46648172.3060307@vwsoft.com> <70f41ba20706041537laba6223v8c879e344d799052@mail.gmail.com> <4665C091.90808@vwsoft.com> <20070606003143.6087bdfa@gumby.homeunix.com.> <70f41ba20706052031q10aff72cy93a8e2e14728d945@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: fbsd 6.2 pf starts -- but not on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:24:51 -0000 On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:31:59 -0700 snowcrash+freebsd wrote: > hi, > > > Have you any particular reason to think that this is really a > > problem? Given that /etc/rc.d/ppp automatically reloads the pf > > rules after the tun device is created. > > though the prob's been fixed, just to ack/comment ... the issue 4 me > was that pf itself was not starting, not that it had started but the > rules were not loaded, or some such ... Reloading the rules is supposed to allow pf to pick-up new interfaces, which is why it's done after ppp is started. I was wondering if Volker had a valid reason for thinking there is a problem, or whether he was speculating from incomplete knowledge. As regards pf not starting, in another sub-thread you seem to be saying that the underlying problem was an irregularity in ppp.conf. ppp.conf is not read until *after* pf starts-up, so can't explain pf's not starting.