From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Apr 14 06:38:51 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA12675
          for questions-outgoing; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 06:38:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA12668
          for <questions@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 06:38:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by root.com (8.8.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id GAA13755; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 06:39:58 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199704141339.GAA13755@root.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: implode.root.com: localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" <sysop@mixcom.com>
cc: rajesha@ct-yardley.com, questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Configuring kernel for Intel EtherExpress PRO/100 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 14 Apr 1997 01:25:41 CDT."
             <3.0.32.19970414012540.00d12220@mixcom.com> 
From: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
Reply-To: dg@root.com
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 06:39:58 -0700
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>At 07:48 PM 4/13/97 -0700, David Greenman wrote:
>>>I am trouble to get the kernel to recognize the Intel EtherExpress
>>>PRO/100.
>>...
>>>		Intel EtherExpress PRO/100 (ISA)
>>
>>   We only have support for the PCI version of the Pro/100B. The ISA card
>>is a different animal entirely and will need a new driver written for it.
>
><shaking head in disbelief>
>
>What I don't understand is why a manufacturer would off an ISA 100bT card.

   ...and call it a "Pro/100" when it is an entirely different animal. Sigh.

-DG

David Greenman
Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project