From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 19 05:06:51 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3405116A4CE for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 05:06:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E7F43D3F for ; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 05:06:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hBJD6m1o006989; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 14:06:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: Wiktor Niesiobedzki From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:53:16 +0100." <20031219125316.GB3682@mail.evip.pl> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 14:06:48 +0100 Message-ID: <6988.1071839208@critter.freebsd.dk> cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GEOM oddity with verbose boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:06:51 -0000 In message <20031219125316.GB3682@mail.evip.pl>, Wiktor Niesiobedzki writes: >Ofcourse, it finds, but what makes me worry, is how there could be a valid bsd >label, if there is a valid UFS2 superblock? >If I understand correctly, in first 8192 bytes of partition are at the same >time: >- UFS2 superblock >- BSD label The UFS2 superblock can be located four different places, at 0, at 8k, 64k or 256k into the partition. The BSDlabel is at 512 bytes offset (on i386). -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.