Date: Tue, 08 Aug 1995 15:40:12 -0700 From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM> To: Gary Clark II <gclarkii@freefall.cdrom.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: FoxPro II.1 Message-ID: <199508082240.PAA02285@corbin.Root.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 08 Aug 95 15:20:38 PDT." <199508082220.PAA18261@freefall.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Since I've gotten a new kdump from Steven, I can now report what is >really going on, instead of the mistranslated things as before. > >How does the following look? > >CALL open(0x40524f,0,0) >NAMI "/dev/null": >RET open 4 >CALL fcntl(0x4,0x6,0xefbfbf34) >RET fcntl -1 errno 99 Unknown error: 99 >CALL close (0x4) >RET close 0 > >Then it goes on to load error messages and then it exits. The above fcntl() is highly bogus. I suspect that the main problem is that the process group/PID (third argument to fcntl) wasn't specified, or a pointer to it was specified rather than the actual value (i.e. it wasn't dereferenced). ...but why you would want to do an F_SETOWN on /dev/null is also a little strange. -DG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199508082240.PAA02285>