From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 29 00:33:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1E616A41F for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:33:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from efinleywork@efinley.com) Received: from postmaster.etv.net (postmaster.etv.net [208.14.190.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E592A43D46 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:33:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from efinleywork@efinley.com) Received: from work.efinley.com ([205.161.203.55] helo=elliotdevelop) by postmaster.etv.net with smtp (Exim 4.52 (FreeBSD)) id 1EVefO-0008mt-6f for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:33:50 -0600 Message-ID: <07d601c5dc20$6ea97270$37cba1cd@emerytelcom.com> From: "Elliot Finley" To: Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:33:50 -0600 Organization: Emery Telcom MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Subject: ports manager vs. portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Elliot Finley List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:33:51 -0000 pros and cons anyone? I've always used portupgrade and it works pretty well, but I'm curious as to how ports manager compares. Elliot