Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 21:32:19 +0200 From: Bruno Ducrot <ducrot@poupinou.org> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: device cpufreq Message-ID: <20050524193219.GG21800@poupinou.org> In-Reply-To: <20050524173319.GA34689@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <20050520033116.62902.qmail@web30704.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20050524155924.GE31564@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050524163229.GE21800@poupinou.org> <20050524173319.GA34689@dragon.NUXI.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 10:33:19AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > Uh, no. > > AMD wishes to sell a 32-bit "value" CPU. They are called the Sempron > brand. It makes most sense from a manufacturing POV to make these from a > K8 derived core than to continue to produce K7 derivatives. A Sempron is > not an Athlon64 that failed QA tests. I don't say that. I said only some (early) Sempron are such amd64 with 64 bit turned off. Maybe I misread and badly interpreted this page: http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=14578 last year. (When I reread it, indeed it do not mention failing things). -- Bruno Ducrot -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050524193219.GG21800>