Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 3 Jun 2012 21:52:36 -0500
From:      Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com>
To:        Oleg Moskalenko <oleg.moskalenko@citrix.com>
Cc:        "mm@freebsd.org" <mm@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Libevent2 port is not passing SSL regression tests
Message-ID:  <CACdU%2Bf_7pVPwh-MYPiksmbcn=CenkKZ9bE_hB=Whm8m_-DgOZg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A3011A2D0170BB@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net>
References:  <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A3011A2D0170B9@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <031222CBCF33214AB2EB4ABA279428A3011A2D0170BB@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Oleg Moskalenko
<oleg.moskalenko@citrix.com> wrote:
> I got reply from libevent guys:
>
> ======================================
> This is actually an openssl bug that prevents OpenSSL 1.0.1 from
> renegotiating with itself successfully when it has negotiated TLS 1.1 or
> TLS 1.2.
>
> It doesn't seem to have an OpenSSL ticket yet; we only figured it out
> yesterday on the Tor bugtracker. See
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/6033 for what we learned
> there. With any luck, this should be fixed in openssl 1.0.1d or 1.0.1e.
> It is nothing to worry about, unless you're using renegotiation with
> OpenSSL and TLS 1.1 or TLS 1.2.
>
Looks like OpenSSL has a fix for this:

http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=22567

We might want to add a patch to the OpenSSL port to fix this before
1.01d is released.

Scot



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACdU%2Bf_7pVPwh-MYPiksmbcn=CenkKZ9bE_hB=Whm8m_-DgOZg>