From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 15 21:40:56 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128C116A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 21:40:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D96B43D66
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 21:40:52 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au)
Received: from gamplex.bde.org (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246])
	by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3p2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA26069;
	Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:40:39 +1100
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:40:38 +1100 (EST)
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org
To: Harald Schmalzbauer <h@schmalzbauer.de>
In-Reply-To: <200401160535.29384@harrymail>
Message-ID: <20040116163049.D2786@gamplex.bde.org>
References: <200401160535.29384@harrymail>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: What happend to CLK_USE_TSC_CALIBRATION?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 05:40:56 -0000

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:

> I'm just curious why CLK_USE_TSC_CALIBRATION was removed.

It was removed because it had no effect.

It had no effect because the code that it affected was removed.

The code was removed because it was not really useful or understood
except by the author of the code.

Bruce