From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 13 00:47:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B8C383B; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:47:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathon.s.wright@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-x236.google.com (mail-vc0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AADDF2A4E; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:47:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id hf12so462888vcb.27 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 17:47:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=0ABESk9/kPdyKo2zHMB6LGKXmIjY++B6GOxXTBmwSCs=; b=sfX3M83SegmqNpQRE/khlDHnEFaSCR6cuGablJu/rhhun5W+Uff/hh0Vu+KAPkb/ND oRTWib1nKUM3++SJasuz8jWoFwGXDD9fHgx0m2vfH1H5qoQMOaYY668ja9wUqfEPcaQp gUw+MtaB4LJwAb8A+xgfVdRLgZ5/EovkFXe6D8saNAHJz15laVQLHEvowhL4XrxQcy7c 33bA94pg1bFDaeY569G30aNUFtXkj7wu6DsTxiuTYmTAjIh525UA0gGl3EVZP6ZUWEVP nP8MV9TfzcwwwE5h3PS8sMp6izS036qa2oQBuW8BTQ0iMJfaB3wP/INkAs20avMqY2WJ WZQg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.27.243 with SMTP id w19mr4232534vdg.3.1379033271739; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 17:47:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.41.66 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Sep 2013 17:47:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201309130040.SAA28208@mail.lariat.net> References: <20130912053559.GF68682@funkthat.com> <979901F9-5F25-4DF1-95A8-32473C55B25F@gmail.com> <52320144.2090807@freebsd.org> <201309130040.SAA28208@mail.lariat.net> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:47:51 -1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD Transient Memory problem? From: Jonathon Wright To: Brett Glass Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-security@freebsd.org" , John-Mark Gurney , Guy Helmer , Julian Elischer X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 00:47:53 -0000 Thanks Brett, That item just made it to the top of the argument list I'm formulating right now from everyone's input. =) That makes a very strong argument for the OS as "approved". On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Brett Glass wrote: > One other point of possible interest which points out how silly > this whole thing is. > > While the NIAP Web site does not list FreeBSD as a "compliant" > operating system product, it lists Juniper routers, which run an > embedded version of FreeBSD, as compliant. See > > https://www.niap-ccevs.org/**CCEVS_Products/pcl.cfm?tech_**name=Router > > There may be other products which have "FreeBSD inside" on their > list as well. > > --Brett Glass > >