Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 23:33:23 -0700 From: milki <milki@rescomp.berkeley.edu> To: Mark Felder <feld@freebsd.org> Cc: perl@freebsd.org Subject: Re: p5-Email-Address woes Message-ID: <20130723063323.GB4911@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <1374527699.28446.9223372036855832473.0B9F69C7@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1374527699.28446.9223372036855832473.0B9F69C7@webmail.messagingengine.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 16:14 Mon 22 Jul , Mark Felder wrote: > Is it possible a test-case could be made and used before committing > updates to this port in the future? Or should we just yell loudly at > upstream? Both are in order. As the maintainer is the general perl@, it would be a little harder to make sure the maintainers and committers would all be wary of the test-case though. The a solution could be to submit a regression test upstream and patch the port for the current version if a patch is known. If no patch is known, then it would be best to mark it broken for users who want unicode support (conditional BROKEN if a PORT_OPTIONS:MUTF8 maybe?).kk -- milki
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130723063323.GB4911>