From owner-freebsd-hubs Fri Dec 20 21:13:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C07C37B401; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 21:13:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from kayak.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.BAYAREA.NET [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3132143EEF; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 21:13:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (athlon.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.3]) by kayak.xcllnt.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gBL5DJrT091864; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 21:13:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@kayak.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gBL5DJJK001619; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 21:13:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gBL5DJJn001618; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 21:13:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 21:13:19 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Olafur Osvaldsson Cc: hubs@FreeBSD.ORG, re@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ia64 5.0-RC2 available Message-ID: <20021221051319.GC1442@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <20021221002842.GA536@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> <20021221022459.GA43097@isnic.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021221022459.GA43097@isnic.is> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 02:24:59AM +0000, Olafur Osvaldsson wrote: > Marcel, > > On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > > This morning (Dec 20th, 2002 11:30 PST) I copied 5.0-RC2 for the ia64 > > platform to ftp-master. This involved the creation of the FTP subtree > > and two ISO images. To be precise: > > > > .../releases/ia64/5.0-RC2/ > > .../releases/ia64/ISO-IMAGES/5.0-RC2-ia64-disc2.iso > > .../releases/ia64/ISO-IMAGES/5.0-RC2-ia64-miniinst.iso > > Why don't you use the same format for the iso dir as usual? > > .../releases/ia64/ISO-IMAGES/5.0-RC2/CHECKSUM.MD5 > .../releases/ia64/ISO-IMAGES/5.0-RC2/disc2.iso > .../releases/ia64/ISO-IMAGES/5.0-RC2/miniinst.iso Our release process has changed to create the new names. It was a suggestion made on this list by an Australian mirror operator and we apparantly liked the idea enough to implement it. Other platforms will have the same naming scheme. To me the immediate consequence was that there was no need for a 5.0-RC2 subdirectory under ISO-IMAGES, because the release name was already in the ISO file name. I'm not sure if the same is done for the other platforms. Basicly because we haven't discussed this. If there's an inconsistency among platforms, we'll resolve it. Being the first I took the liberty to set a possible standard. It is even possible that move ISO-IMAGES up one directory so that it is shared between platforms because we also have the platform in the ISO file name. This is speculation... FYI, -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hubs" in the body of the message