From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 2 20:34:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5B1106566C for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2008 20:34:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@telenix.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D1888FC16 for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2008 20:34:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@telenix.org) Received: (qmail 7999 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2008 20:08:09 -0000 Received: from april.chuckr.org (HELO april.telenix.org) (chuckr@[66.92.151.30]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 2 Jul 2008 20:08:09 -0000 Message-ID: <486BDDAA.70806@telenix.org> Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:57:30 -0400 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071107) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=F3DCA0E9; url=http://pgp.mit.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: avahi-gtk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 20:34:49 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm having problems building this, it dpoesn't see it's own defintion for symbol avahi_init_i18n (it's defined it it's own code but I guess not linked in). I went and googled it, it's apparently been spotted as a problem with all avahi-gtk versions at 6.22.2 and earlier, and it seems that our port is at 6.22.1. it was fixed for sure in .4. Myu problem is, I can't for the life of me see where the damn minor version is set. All i can see is, it's set to 6.22, and no hint of a trailing .1. So, either, if anyone knows what the fix is, OR if anyone knows where the minor is being set, I'd be happy enough. You know, just as an aside, one of my problems with today's ports are the huge reliance on sub-makefiles. It nearly always makes things more difficult to trace out errors. Yes, it's more elegant, but I just don't believe that selling out for elegance is a good idea; I would rather have it easier to see and fix, that just seems so obvious to me. Don't get me wrong, I very much like things like bsd.port.mk, it's things like hiding the names, version numbers, things like that about the ports that I dislike, like the bsd.gnome.mk, and all the masterdirs. I just personally don't see the gain it making references unobvious. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkhr3aoACgkQz62J6PPcoOnT+wCgnMNr2jxKd3TVfsdAJnTWsDCO 1G8Anivr6mIL0xX4brtR5PkwBAv/q0dy =wrL7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----