Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 9 Jun 2015 21:03:53 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
To:        "Russell L. Carter" <rcarter@pinyon.org>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: umtx_lock and friends
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.4.64.1506092102460.10480@sea.ntplx.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.1506092054570.10480@sea.ntplx.net>
References:  <55777108.5020206@pinyon.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.1506091940001.10480@sea.ntplx.net> <55778A60.9090200@pinyon.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.1506092054570.10480@sea.ntplx.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 9 Jun 2015, Daniel Eischen wrote:

> On Tue, 9 Jun 2015, Russell L. Carter wrote:
>
>> On FreeBSD 10-stable r283752 amd64, here is the compile line:
>> 
>> /usr/bin/cc -O -Wall tester.cpp -o tester
>> /tmp/tester-b681b3.o: In function `main':
>> tester.cpp:(.text+0x35): undefined reference to `_umtx_lock(umtx*)'
>> tester.cpp:(.text+0x5c): undefined reference to `_umtx_unlock(umtx*)'
>> 
>> Compilers don't matter, linking against libthr or libstdthreads
>> doesn't matter.
>
> Is cc doing something special because it thinks it is C++?
> I'm on 10-stable amd64 and that example (saved as tester.c)
> works just fine.

Try:

   /usr/bin/cc -O -Wall -x c tester.cpp -o tester

-- 
DE



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.1506092102460.10480>