From owner-freebsd-fs Thu Aug 19 17: 6:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from cygnus.rush.net (cygnus.rush.net [209.45.245.133]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7411520D for ; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 17:06:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@rush.net) Received: from localhost (bright@localhost) by cygnus.rush.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id UAA02736; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 20:13:25 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 20:13:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Alfred Perlstein To: "Alton, Matthew" Cc: "'Russell Cattelan'" , "'fs@FreeBSD.ORG'" Subject: RE: BSD-XFS Update In-Reply-To: <0740CBD1D149D31193EB0008C7C56836EB8B15@STLABCEXG012> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Alton, Matthew wrote: > Pinned in the AIX-style "pinned memory" sense? Succinctly, AIX > allows userland programs to tag memory pages so as to guarantee that > they will not be swapped to backing store. Portions of the _KERNEL_ > are paged out instead if necessary. > > I assume that the pinning is of the AIX sort and that it is desirable, if > not necessary, for the realtime throughput guarantee policy. Nes pas? man mlock -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message