From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Jan 20 9:41: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D24D37B405; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:41:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from iedowse@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0KHWs307650; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:32:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iedowse) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 09:32:54 -0800 (PST) From: Message-Id: <200201201732.g0KHWs307650@freefall.freebsd.org> To: howardjp@wam.umd.edu, iedowse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/10924: Extensions to biff(1) Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: Extensions to biff(1) State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: iedowse State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 20 09:28:12 PST 2002 State-Changed-Why: Patches against our existing biff rather than a reimplementation of it would be much preferred! You can change the status of another tty using our current biff if you redirect stderr to that tty, but it is a bit odd that it uses stderr and not stdin. Do you still wish to see support for a tty argument? http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=10924 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message