From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 8 12:31:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B3E16A4CE for ; Sat, 8 May 2004 12:31:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE39743D1F for ; Sat, 8 May 2004 12:31:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phoffman@proper.com) Received: from [10.20.30.249] (dsl2-63-249-109-252.cruzio.com [63.249.109.252]) (authenticated bits=0) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i48JV7dh037798 for ; Sat, 8 May 2004 12:31:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phoffman@proper.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: phoffprop@mail.proper.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <409D13DF.6020307@gmx.de> References: <409D13DF.6020307@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 12:30:47 -0700 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Paul Hoffman Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Subject: Re: Not needing the console for a system reload X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 19:31:13 -0000 At 7:07 PM +0200 5/8/04, Ph. Schulz wrote: >>Is there a way to give a "shutdown now; ; exit" >>command from the command line if I'm logged in remotely? Or do I >>really need to use "reboot" and go through the whole hardware >>reinitialization? >> > > I don't think this is possible. The reason is (if I understand >things correctly) that if you're in single user mode, the network >isn't started, so there's no way of accessing the machine through >ssh, rlogin or something similar. Exactly right. That's why I want a script that starts the process while I'm logged in over the network, but finishes the process even after I'm kicked off. > I think you're best off if you hook up a serial console to your >machine and remotely access that console. There are commercial >solutions for this but any low-end PC will do. That is massive overkill for something that should be much simpler and hopefully not involve new hard ware. --Paul Hoffman