From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 18 06:19:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E52106564A; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 06:19:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D0E8FC12; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 06:19:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3I5m5eG055597; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 23:48:06 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <337897.86270.qm@web113503.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 23:48:04 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <337897.86270.qm@web113503.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> To: giffunip@tutopia.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-50.0 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Dimitry Andric Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Removal of libobjc from the base system X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 06:19:05 -0000 On Apr 17, 2011, at 12:33 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > Yeah it's too outdated to be of any use. >=20 > IMHO, you can axe libf2c too... >=20 Honest question here, is there a newer version of libf2c that lives in = ports and is adopted by people who use fortran? The one that I find in = the base system seems to be a similar match to the one in = ports/devel/f2c. Is the one in the base system a pain to maintain or = otherwise holding back other work, or has it been made obsolete by = something in ports? Is removing it from the base system anything more = than just churn? With libobjc, the one in ports looks to indeed be a lot newer, and I'll = take it on faith that the gnustep ports automatically installs it, = overriding the base copy and making it essentially obsolete. Scott