From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 2 01:21:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2326316A4CE for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 01:21:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp2.Stanford.EDU (smtp2.Stanford.EDU [171.67.16.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE9043D41 for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 01:21:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from romain@kzsu.stanford.edu) Received: from kzsu.stanford.edu (KZSU.Stanford.EDU [171.66.118.90]) by smtp2.Stanford.EDU (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j121LTgE024079; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 17:21:30 -0800 Received: from kzsu.stanford.edu (localhost. [127.0.0.1]) by kzsu.stanford.edu (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j121LJGU048815; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 17:21:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from romain@kzsu.stanford.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: kzsu.stanford.edu: Host localhost. [127.0.0.1] claimed to be kzsu.stanford.edu Received: (from romain@localhost) by kzsu.stanford.edu (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id j121LJuf048814; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 17:21:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from romain) Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 17:21:19 -0800 From: Romain Kang To: David Scheidt Message-ID: <20050202012119.GA48725@kzsu.stanford.edu> Mail-Followup-To: Romain Kang , David Scheidt , hackers@freebsd.org References: <420010BC.9080400@attglobal.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <420010BC.9080400@attglobal.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45 cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /etc/hosts lines starting with white space are ignored X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 01:21:34 -0000 On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 06:29:00PM -0500, David Scheidt wrote: > If a line in /etc/hosts starts with a space or tab, it's not read. I'm > not sure that's really a desirable behavior. I'm quite sure it's not > the vehavior I expected. The format of /etc/hosts has been thus for more than 20 years over multiple platforms, so it's what everyone else expects. Sorry. Romain