From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 21 20:04:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB1B16A403 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 20:04:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@childeric.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C0143D46 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 20:04:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@childeric.freeserve.co.uk) Received: from [172.23.170.147] (helo=anti-virus03-10) by smtp-out2.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FX1rU-00063t-Th; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 21:04:16 +0100 Received: from [82.35.115.7] (helo=[192.168.10.60]) by asmtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1FX1rR-0007za-Bz; Fri, 21 Apr 2006 21:04:13 +0100 Message-ID: <44493AD1.8000504@childeric.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 21:04:33 +0100 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060417) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4447FC54.7090305@childeric.freeserve.co.uk> <200604202311.45346.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> In-Reply-To: <200604202311.45346.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: RW Subject: Re: portmanager and linux-flashplugin6 removed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 20:04:19 -0000 RW wrote: > On Thursday 20 April 2006 22:25, Chris Whitehouse wrote: >> Hi >> >> I've just cvsup'ed ports and run portmanager -s. Part way through it >> asks me if it can remove linux-flashplugin-6.0r79_3 because of the >> licencing issue. When I say no portmanager quits. Actual output below. >> >> 1) Would it be possible for portmanager to at least allow me to complete >> the status request? snip > > You could try using the -ip option, or alternately restore the original port > contents, and do minimal maintainence on it yourself. I tried the -ip option but it still halted. Restoring the original port directory works, thanks. Removing the port directory for another installed port caused exactly the same result so as you say it is just how portmanager is. Incidentally portmanager walked through a port upgrade on my desktop box from 30th Dec to 30th March without a hitch, including the 20060223 libtool change. Would it be a good idea to add to the note in UPDATING to suggest that portmanager is worth a try? Chris