From owner-freebsd-current Fri Jan 5 23:09:06 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id XAA29291 for current-outgoing; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 23:09:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from grumble.grondar.za (root@grumble.grondar.za [196.7.18.130]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA29276 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 1996 23:09:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (mark@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grumble.grondar.za (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA18156; Sat, 6 Jan 1996 09:08:37 +0200 (SAT) Message-Id: <199601060708.JAA18156@grumble.grondar.za> X-Authentication-Warning: grumble.grondar.za: Host mark@localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Current is looking more stable these days..? Date: Sat, 06 Jan 1996 09:08:34 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > In contravention of all reason, I've been running it on my gateway box > lately and, as of this morning's sup, things look pretty reasonable > (at least from the perspective of an EISA/ISA box with a 1542CF > controller). Hey, Brave man! > What do -current folk think about a 2.2-SNAP pretty soon here? Would > you like a grace period of a week or so to tidy up first? Longer? Please do it now. Grace periods always get extended. (is this a snap of 2.2 (ie off HEAD code, not RELENG2_1_0)? M -- Mark Murray 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa +27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200 Finger mark@grondar.za for PGP key