From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Jan 31 10:54:47 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id KAA24633 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 31 Jan 1995 10:54:47 -0800
Received: from anvil.appsmiths.com (appsmiths.sccsi.com [198.65.134.98]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA24626 for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 1995 10:54:42 -0800
Received: (from hoppy@localhost) by anvil.appsmiths.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id MAA08430 for hackers@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 31 Jan 1995 12:54:11 -0600
From: "Clay D. Hopperdietzel" <hoppy@appsmiths.com>
Message-Id: <199501311854.MAA08430@anvil.appsmiths.com>
Subject: Some changes to gateway stuff?
To: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 1995 12:54:10 -0600 (CST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 388       
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


I have a 2.0 box on my desk that wants to use a 1.1.5.1 box as a gateway
out to the internet.

The version of 2.0 which got pressed on CD-ROM seems to think this is a good
idea.  No problem.

I supped CURRENT, and tried to make this work, and had this problem:

	# route add default <blah>
	protocal not supported

Just for fun, I supped the 12 Jan snapshot.  Same thing.

What gives?