From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 27 18:24:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A429F106574F for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 18:24:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml-freebsd-wireless@bettercom.de) Received: from mail.bettermail.de (f0.bettercom.de [95.156.194.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070888FC17 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2011 18:24:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 91108 invoked by uid 98); 27 Dec 2011 19:24:40 +0100 Received: from 178.203.181.49 by f0.bettercom.de (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (clamdscan: 0.96.3/12172. Clear:RC:1(178.203.181.49):. Processed in 0.012147 secs); 27 Dec 2011 18:24:40 -0000 Received: from ip-178-203-181-49.unitymediagroup.de (HELO [192.168.178.44]) (martin@[178.203.181.49]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.bettermail.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 27 Dec 2011 19:24:40 +0100 Message-ID: <4EFA0D51.4080707@bettercom.de> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 19:24:17 +0100 From: Martin Lesser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-DE; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd References: <4EF50AF4.3030105@bettercom.de> <4EFA0539.2020508@bettercom.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ath updates - please test X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 18:24:42 -0000 Am 27.12.2011 19:05, schrieb Adrian Chadd: > "Actual ath" ? What do you mean? :) Are there plans to backport "developing" base/head/sys/dev/ath/* to the upcoming 9.X-release? ;-) > Also, the AR5416 isn't all that great a NIC, it's their first > generation 11n NIC. The newer stuff is a _lot_ nicer. So anything with > an AR9220/AR9280 or AR9227/AR9287 (PCI/PCIe) would be better. Any recommendation for this stuff is really welcome. :-) The common problem is to know which chip or chipset is used in which NIC... > I need to write up some tools to make that easier to ascertain. Stay > tuned. I will. Cheers - Martin