From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 17 16:52:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425883B4; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 16:52:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kwm@rainbow-runner.nl) Received: from fep11.mx.upcmail.net (fep11.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531629B4; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 16:52:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from edge01.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.236]) by viefep11-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.05.05 201-2260-151-110-20120111) with ESMTP id <20130317165232.QFQI21781.viefep11-int.chello.at@edge01.upcmail.net>; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:52:32 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([178.84.132.32]) by edge01.upcmail.net with edge id CgsX1l00j0i5fp601gsXDs; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:52:32 +0100 X-SourceIP: 178.84.132.32 Message-ID: <5145F4D0.1060608@rainbow-runner.nl> Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:52:32 +0100 From: Koop Mast User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Thiel Subject: Re: shotwell References: <20130311185107.GB91604@redundancy.redundancy.org> In-Reply-To: <20130311185107.GB91604@redundancy.redundancy.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130317-0, 17-03-2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Cc: gnome@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 16:52:40 -0000 On 11-3-2013 19:51, David Thiel wrote: > Hello gnome, > > I currently maintain the shotwell port, but don't really have the > resources to keep it up to date right now. I think it should probably > belong to gnome@ anyway, as it depends on a lot of gnome stuff being up > to date, like vala. Any objection to me changing the maintainership to > you guys? > > Thanks, > David Well as far as I know it isn't officaly part of the GNOME desktop. Also since we already short on man power, I rather not add to it. Could you try and see if someone on ports@ is willing? -Koop