Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 14:48:55 -0800 From: Paul Beard <paulbeard@gmail.com> To: "Phillip N." <pneumann@gmail.com> Cc: mono@freebsd.org Subject: Re: monodoc and semaphores Message-ID: <EAA23167-3C6B-4C15-B309-C58631E5DEBE@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1235947172.1750.35.camel@negro> References: <5088B7F6-DAA9-4B9A-96DE-DBF23CD1A036@gmail.com> <1235941437.1750.30.camel@negro> <E191766C-65F7-4FDC-AB59-4270AF6753D9@gmail.com> <1235947172.1750.35.camel@negro>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 1, 2009, at 2:39 PM, Phillip N. wrote: > How strange. You seem to be using portupgrade to upgrade monodoc, =20 > but it > does not see that there is a new version of mono wich should be > upgraded. > > How are you exactly using portupgrade to update monodoc? > > Portupgrade (or yourself) should update mono prior to monodoc, becouse > it should be used with mono 2.0. > > Good luck. > > I'm not doing anything special, just running portupgrade in the =20 monodoc directory. I assumed (na=EFvely?) that mono would be upgraded as = =20 a dependency, but I am doing it by hand now. -- Paul Beard contact info: www.paulbeard.org/paulbeard.vcf Are you trying to win an argument or solve a problem?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?EAA23167-3C6B-4C15-B309-C58631E5DEBE>