From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Fri Jun 1 03:31:10 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A1AF7DCE4; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 03:31:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christopherhall.hsw@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pg0-x242.google.com (mail-pg0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB3B9723DF; Fri, 1 Jun 2018 03:31:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christopherhall.hsw@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pg0-x242.google.com with SMTP id l65-v6so241083pgl.8; Thu, 31 May 2018 20:31:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=X0ZFs1wgebB3sCetuXleiZyEWXFSEatRHwcIjE59hlo=; b=jqW0VNVezwRM1EIQxA3qETi6MkIeiD1PLhncIFDbH13Ozlk/z1MqzigwhVvRVRArMf fuIKPJuGbEBorofwSn9pwwuZ6q+YP8qjBU996QrebzYPPZoxE423pHKay157UPzuxjnw LgdSyySdwB1b5kGpZLyUHNOpgDSSi0BE10vvKDRdjUdP9UNHZ0nrRvR1ay3Nq1QZI8Z0 B0FSUWSotqlQNLD6bA2JBun/3Sur8ggAxfkaVIfqDYhWAnG3+w2BSDC5s9N1H6m4EQDG 5fGRSzI3aFGh/mK4tku3v9tXOiw7pY4dvP0lo9lTUTYJ0P3g+f64uitVndiZi79KfcYk aoLQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=X0ZFs1wgebB3sCetuXleiZyEWXFSEatRHwcIjE59hlo=; b=GWjPrd7WSiKv/cVYyd+XQuzVRLVinU4ntz5BLyh52WH4Uxw++872U0jDu1mKkM/xKY MKPfFFCmt7g4G6RMf+GjF+000vwbldgl2PhPydHYjuPfTVf0RcBjIfcT5iFYybysMkAj NtaX7me+khoPaR6FumL1aKhb90HiHhzXHYZ7BcNie8MzigyqC7XQVbJ0eZS42TKy+5cR TnQVMgl751933XbChYMDeWUUUSFfHo6REmhabeiZ6v9fsM1kj0vFywFeS5pL31+BDutK uB3D4UyakiinqSDlKunY+ElKIBUDbpGaVtgZ1IpK6AHRWz9/3024R7pgnFUp2t8yqUoD 1lVw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwchGulx/bQns2ULydDS1N+mlgk//m/fjaVWmhZhDRJldpFwaa4R 4e6+VVai7KnEAUpcMm+nFXU1EPKj37I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJ7Oyn8utxMG/hlPTbAlzhvfmpIlbeimAZ+6ToX5V9uPkNIQA+KuRLySE4kmpanI0BNBFesDw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:a60a:: with SMTP id t10-v6mr7479690pge.351.1527823868715; Thu, 31 May 2018 20:31:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (2001-b030-2314-0200-f279-59ff-fe6a-4741.hinet-ip6.hinet.net. [2001:b030:2314:200:f279:59ff:fe6a:4741]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g4-v6sm22492883pfg.38.2018.05.31.20.31.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 31 May 2018 20:31:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 11:31:02 +0800 From: Christopher Hall To: Glen Barber Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ed Maste Subject: Re: Call for Testing: 12.0-CURRENT amd64 memstick installer boot-testing wanted Message-ID: <20180601113048.00910728@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20180530155039.GE97814@FreeBSD.org> References: <20180530155039.GE97814@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2018 03:31:10 -0000 Hello Glen, On Wed, 30 May 2018 15:50:39 +0000, Glen Barber wrote: > Hi, > > Could folks please help boot-test the most recent 12.0-CURRENT amd64 > memstick images on various hardware? Note, this is not a request to > install 12.0-CURRENT, only a boot-test with various system knobs > tweaked. > > The most recent images are available at: > https://download.freebsd.org/ftp/snapshots/amd64/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/12.0/FreeBSD-12.0-CURRENT-amd64-20180529-r334337-mini-memstick.img > https://download.freebsd.org/ftp/snapshots/amd64/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/12.0/FreeBSD-12.0-CURRENT-amd64-20180529-r334337-memstick.img > > We are interested in testing both UEFI and CSM/BIOS/legacy mode, as we > would like to get this included in the upcoming 11.2-RELEASE if the > change that had been committed addresses several boot issues reported > recently. > > Please help test, and report back (both successes and failures). on Thinkpad T420s mini image boots in both UEFI and Legacy modes, but UEFI is considerably faster. > > Thanks, > > Glen > -- Best Regards. Christopher Hall.