From owner-freebsd-isp  Fri Sep 29  5:25:57 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Received: from swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net (swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.120.123])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8075A37B423; Fri, 29 Sep 2000 05:25:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from veager.siteplus.net (1Cust36.tnt9.chattanooga.tn.da.uu.net [63.39.120.36])
	by swan.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3-EL_1_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA22297;
	Fri, 29 Sep 2000 05:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 08:24:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jim Weeks <jim@siteplus.net>
To: Andy Wolf <Andy.Wolf@nextra.de>
Cc: James Wyatt <jwyatt@rwsystems.net>,
	Jan Knepper <jan@digitaldaemon.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG,
	freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: RE: DNS: having domain1.com and domain1.net point to the same IP.
In-Reply-To: <001301c02a0d$480b5ea0$f1d761c2@andy.seicom.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009290820270.272-100000@veager.siteplus.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Andy Wolf wrote:
 
> We use two A records now and therefor accept redundancy. The reverse lookup
> of course can only point to one of the labels.

The general consensus throughout the industry seems to be that C names are
evil.

I have never been bitten by just using A names.

Jim



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message