From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 15:12:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D82416A420 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:12:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@g-mapps.com) Received: from valium.tcm.gmapps.net.uk (valium.tcm.gmapps.net.uk [194.207.235.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63FC743D46 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:12:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@g-mapps.com) Received: from [62.24.226.220] ([62.24.226.220]) (authenticated bits=0) by valium.tcm.gmapps.net.uk (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k1RFGFeW017733; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:16:15 GMT (envelope-from danny@g-mapps.com) Message-ID: <440316E3.3@g-mapps.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:12:35 +0000 From: Danny Butroyd User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060123) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Claus Guttesen References: <4402F009.1000407@g-mapps.com> <6.2.3.4.0.20060227093542.086c56c0@64.7.153.2> <44031194.8000300@g-mapps.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on valium.tcm.gmapps.net.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nfs woes in FreeBSD 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:12:51 -0000 Claus Guttesen wrote: >>>> I have major problems using NFS on FreeBSD. My setup is:- >>> I know there have been a number of changes that might help you since >>> 6.0. I would try going to 6.1 first to see if your NFS problems go >>> away. Also, are you mounting TCP or UDP mounts ? What version of NFS ? >> I have tried both tcp and udp mounts and have the same issues, the >> version of nfs is v3 (the default I believe). > > What is your rw-size in /etc/fstab? I have tried it with the defaults (i.e. none set) and also with the following:- r and w set to 32768. Danny > > regards > Claus > >