From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 12 20:59:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.forumone.com (orion.forumone.com [207.197.141.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95CBB15002 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 1999 20:59:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from adhir@forumone.com) Received: from dipper (dipper.forumone.com [207.197.235.14]) by mail.forumone.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47FB4A8DF; Tue, 12 Oct 1999 23:59:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 23:58:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Alok K. Dhir" To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Michael Lucas , "Sameer R. Manek" , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3.5-stable ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Would the fact that Yahoo! runs FreeBSD (it does) satisfy your client...? On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Michael Lucas wrote: > > > You know that, and I know that. > > > > Clients like the little piece of paper. Especially when I bill > > hourly, and they've been burned by a variety of MCSEs. ;) > > You're not going to get a piece of paper guaranteeing the stability of the > system - this is free software, there will be no fairings, etc. At best, > you could get a verbal statement from jordan about how he feels about > -stable maturity, and the opinion of the userbase (i.e. this list), but > nothing you can really use as a shield against your clients if things > don't work, except "it works fine for most other people" > > Kris > > ---- > XOR for AES -- join the campaign! > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message