From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 15:21:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F37716A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:21:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com (sj-iport-4.cisco.com [171.68.10.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F6E43D1F; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:20:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lorenzo@cisco.com) Received: from cisco.com (cypher.cisco.com [171.69.11.143]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i0BNKfQu006697; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:20:41 -0800 (PST) Received: (from lorenzo@localhost) by cisco.com (8.8.8/2.6/Cisco List Logging/8.8.8) id PAA17074; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:20:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:20:40 -0800 From: Lorenzo Vicisano To: "M. Warner Losh" Message-ID: <20040111152040.A16863@cisco.com> References: <20040111003426.E0EF55D08@ptavv.es.net> <200401110229.46446.zec@tel.fer.hr> <20040111011553.A12385@cisco.com> <20040111.142357.50578253.imp@bsdimp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040111.142357.50578253.imp@bsdimp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: prism 2.5 timeout in wi_cmd 0x010b X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:21:01 -0000 Warner, On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 02:23:57PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20040111011553.A12385@cisco.com> > Lorenzo Vicisano writes: > : However after upgrding the Prism firmware (1.1.0 -> 1.1.1) > : the lock up stopped. > > You really really really want to be using 1.4.5 firmware. Older > firmware is known to be buggy. I was referring to the "primary", as for the "station" I went from 1.4.2 to 1.7.4 .. but does the "station" firmware affect the functionality as a "client" anyways ? Lorenzo