Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:43:17 +1000 From: Andrew Reilly <andrew-freebsd@areilly.bpc-users.org> To: Jonathan Fosburgh <jonathan@fosburgh.org> Cc: amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD/i386 inside a jail on FreeBSD/amd64 Message-ID: <20060720234317.GA99687@duncan.reilly.home> In-Reply-To: <200607182036.35123.jonathan@fosburgh.org> References: <200607182036.35123.jonathan@fosburgh.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 08:36:34PM -0500, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote: > I am trying to setup a jail on my amd64 system (6.1-STABLE). I have the jail > installed and I can log into it, even remotely (it is running on a private > IP, I am using pf with rdr rules). However, certain things are not working: > First, ps doesn't work right. I have procfs enabled and /proc on the jail > does have entries, but commands such as ps and top fail. ps just prints out > the column headers, and top fails with kvm_open: kinfo_proc size mismatch > (expected 768, got 1088). I assume this is due to actually using the amd64 > procfs. Is there anyway to make this work? One of the things I am trying to > do is make wine work, but since the jail uses the amd64 kernel, there is no > user_ldt and so wine fails. I have seen that at least some Linux distros > (Ubuntu comes to mind) use chroot environments to run wine on amd64, and I > was hoping that something similar could be done in FreeBSD. Does anyone have > pointers? I've been wondering about running wine on my amd64 box, myself, but haven't got around to trying, yet. Why does it need to run in a jail? Wouldn't just running 32-bit winebin on a machine with the appropriate compatability libraries do the job? It's been a while since I've run wine at all. Does it have curly external dependancies, now? Cheers, -- Andrew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060720234317.GA99687>