Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:25:00 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" <msoulier@digitaltorque.ca> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apparently, csh programming is considered harmful. Message-ID: <20071216232459.GC5874@piglet.digitaltorque.ca> In-Reply-To: <20071214022529.GA2571@kobe.laptop> References: <20071214010542.GA19553@demeter.hydra> <20071214022529.GA2571@kobe.laptop>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 14/12/07 Giorgos Keramidas said: > Do you have any _particular_ parts of the csh-whynot article that you > would like to discuss, or this is a free for all flame? :) It's the lack of shell functions that gets me. Once a script reaches a certain size, I just move to Perl, Python, Tcl, Ruby, etc. Mike -- Michael P. Soulier <msoulier@digitaltorque.ca> "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHZbPLKGqCc1vIvggRAgf3AJ4rdRptfGNjM1QZKl1DjD/V7zG72QCgmWqv RO1P45iZcB24nxKlvE8c5pw= =/pLa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071216232459.GC5874>