From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Feb 24 11:48:37 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA11755
          for questions-outgoing; Mon, 24 Feb 1997 11:48:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from odin.visigenic.com (odin.visigenic.com [204.179.98.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA11750
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 1997 11:48:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from VSI48 (vsi48.visigenic.com [206.64.15.185])
          by odin.visigenic.com (Netscape Mail Server v2.02) with SMTP
          id AAA2499; Mon, 24 Feb 1997 11:45:39 -0800
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970224114755.0099f550@visigenic.com>
X-Sender: toneil@visigenic.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 1997 11:47:55 -0800
To: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>
From: "Tim Oneil" <toneil@visigenic.com>
Subject: Re: * searching a good priest for zombies processes *
Cc: questions@freebsd.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

At 10:26 AM 2/24/97 -0800, you wrote:
>You should contact corollary.com regarding this; it's a bug.  This is
>fairly common for ported programs, especially if the porter isn't familiar
>with BSD's handling of processes.  

Doug;

That would beg the question; how different IS BSD's process subsystem?
Comming from the Solaris and HP worlds, I would really like to know.

-Tim