From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Jan 24 09:40:17 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA28106
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 24 Jan 1998 09:40:17 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from etinc.com (et-gw.etinc.com [207.252.1.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA28099
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 24 Jan 1998 09:40:10 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from dennis@etinc.com)
Received: from dbsys.etinc.com (dbsys.etinc.com [207.252.1.18]) by etinc.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA13576; Sat, 24 Jan 1998 12:42:18 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19980124124408.007ca210@etinc.com>
X-Sender: dennis@etinc.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32)
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 1998 12:44:09 -0500
To: dg@root.com
From: dennis <dennis@etinc.com>
Subject: Re: Intel 8640 cards 
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

At 05:30 PM 1/23/98 -0800, David Greenman wrote:
>>Are the "new" intel 8640 cards fully supported? ( a salesman told me
>>that they are the same at the Pro 100/B...but I'd like to know for certain.
>
>   I don't know what an 8640 is. As Tom said, if it is the Pro/100+, it
should
>work fine and look like a 82557+82555 to the system.

oh..yes I think it is the Pro 100+ .

thanks

Dennis