From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jun 3 19:01:44 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA04317 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 3 Jun 1996 19:01:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA04309 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 1996 19:01:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.barrnet.net (mail.barrnet.net [131.119.246.7]) by who.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) with ESMTP id TAA03452 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 1996 19:01:39 -0700 Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17]) by mail.barrnet.net (8.7.5/MAIL-RELAY-LEN) with ESMTP id TAA22231 for ; Mon, 3 Jun 1996 19:00:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Root.COM (8.7.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id SAA21139; Mon, 3 Jun 1996 18:59:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199606040159.SAA21139@Root.COM> X-Authentication-Warning: implode.Root.COM: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: dem@comdyn.com.au (David Mikov) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INTEL EtherExpress PRO/100 support or not ? In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 04 Jun 1996 11:15:54 EST." <9606040115.AA24295@comdyn.comdyn.com.au> From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Mon, 03 Jun 1996 18:59:04 -0700 Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Dear All, > > Is the INTEL EtherExpress PRO/100 (82557 chip) PCI adapter > supported by FreeBSD 2.1 ? That's the Pro/100B, and yes, it's supported in 2.1-stable (but not in 2.1-RELEASE). > Note: I believe there is an older board based on the > (82556 chip) that does not work, is this correct ? Right - that's a different animal and we don't support it (yet?). -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project