From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 28 16:46:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0334616A4CE; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:46:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net (mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net [151.164.30.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E9B43D1F; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:46:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (0565ada285687d61c4ffc73e548a33f8@adsl-67-119-53-203.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.203])i1T0kBqK023306; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 18:46:11 -0600 (CST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B6C7266CAF; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:46:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:46:10 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Alan Cox Message-ID: <20040229004610.GA46894@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040229003531.GA46612@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040229004328.GQ13792@cs.rice.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040229004328.GQ13792@cs.rice.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: alc@FreeBSD.org cc: current@FreeBSD.org cc: peter@FreeBSD.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: pmap_lazyfix: spun for 50000000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 00:46:13 -0000 --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 06:43:28PM -0600, Alan Cox wrote: > On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 04:35:31PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > bento is running a 5.2-BETA kernel from early December (AFAICR), and > > recently logged this on the console: > >=20 > > pmap_lazyfix: spun for 50000000 > >=20 > > The code in i386/i386/pmap.c doesn't seem to have changed recently. > > Is this a bug that has since been fixed? > >=20 >=20 > To the best of my knowledge, it is not evidence of a bug. It is > a warning that a deadlock avoidance mechanism kicked in. OK, perhaps it should be conditionalized on boot -v or something. Kris --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAQTZSWry0BWjoQKURAlYxAKD1vvnLqc7Xc5joGxsE7uw2CFrNrwCdEMwN PtMyV531dP2DH+eYKI2Lo4g= =sTyI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/--