From owner-freebsd-embedded@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 1 08:15:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F141106566C for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 08:15:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D598FC15 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 08:15:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbbfr13 with SMTP id fr13so1858238vbb.13 for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:15:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Zb+BpPLXTE8yOeM84MQLAZ0t7Az2KdSwP+eR3CYP084=; b=gB2KfsjAVja84fy22ahr/xJCE1Tm8rdhR/TLaXxLrrfRlsdSsNTigPPqPBz/l8mnTH b+0t2dcz+9hWk++djc6Z3ecy6LeRhJPNjfvnzEpZu1pMILbkE/4hTFIFqx6kZmU3QYY0 Zs5ncxU1nt9gvA0VEC57IVsCHW6qvx9FERTqM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.33.69 with SMTP id p5mr5095314vdi.78.1322727356864; Thu, 01 Dec 2011 00:15:56 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.186.74 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Dec 2011 00:15:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <447CC818-CEA3-46B9-A15F-E0FA737B0EB4@bluezbox.com> References: <4ED6FD47.6050704@bluezbox.com> <96407605-79A9-4AE3-AC2F-13BD97943153@lassitu.de> <447CC818-CEA3-46B9-A15F-E0FA737B0EB4@bluezbox.com> Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 16:15:56 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: tgBwOojymTKXpBv00PR7CkRyEtk Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Oleksandr Tymoshenko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports cross-compilation X-BeenThere: freebsd-embedded@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 08:15:58 -0000 .. hm. thinking about it, why not have a port variable flag that marks a port as "cross compiles" ? Then we could (in theory) do a cross-compile test run based on which ports in the ports tree have this variable set? Adrian