From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Thu Feb 16 06:47:38 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB08CE100D for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 06:47:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@nuxi.nl) Received: from mail-yw0-x231.google.com (mail-yw0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E04A1D6F for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 06:47:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@nuxi.nl) Received: by mail-yw0-x231.google.com with SMTP id l19so4028215ywc.2 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 22:47:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nuxi-nl.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RVCQhJiytjom3FyW3GVaEQrAorq8PHgbn71pTzXkeyw=; b=mmaK0xOIfPq7ZLRlyn/ifVDOCR7GisgKooRq3ASrBLy/YL/jqNNF2WfmmYqRxUN2MC icjCjUQ5VYC1c5C3WZJEld+e5I6BVxCdiW2hqSS437dzaB7xsLOQq/tbYvh0/bBWpQNU sq0Jzk/A/uXknZ3oi5w4tlelBdILK2xuJyd7FNydP2L+9FDF2u81TBoQHkMGOk8hudHP vkBZUVj0iFJv/mXZ3OkhQ1NWNJxYV/jnTdAZdquSLcOaBfwsQj+PxwIPAnjiihVLuUKC n6ULvILyJJsrzTAtHuGxmwhM20SEiroDf7mLUmP7SgZtuqHQrgiFy3wdSc7tVskawFqw ycgA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RVCQhJiytjom3FyW3GVaEQrAorq8PHgbn71pTzXkeyw=; b=qJOWDD7MA11BmSt333ptT3PV12/g0x8Q7rO8woPEny4Vnzf7wNJBoMb/qOAcv0Phqg bu7YeEnfzQMz5xkjcbkcEtT1gU36Akpd4vLMcalnjnlKaOhqiTMIcdJJTxHAsI62d8UH jwKdHfCttAJiW4jmcZ+JJkPw8j2QnHmagxttKC7qGg/qgWHXmJ4uPuLS9CZXdRzZbpk3 08T6hsBpLcQpI+kr0NAV+fTv6BQZtvtZeLAUf167EPwlcYEEm3QMZXoZBz6g7pHUl32G l8OPkdWuUqWQbFKiI2TbEiifBtkr8ZHDLbfnzYiLp6Red7C+nDvRDDrPz5w1p6V38IKF KoTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lb+6UV7KVWBsAPern+c13sTayJl5RYAuWqXurevdcHCkucrcVAYalKpmhtqteRLc9Jso093mo2/fsPug== X-Received: by 10.129.172.80 with SMTP id z16mr484832ywj.6.1487227657368; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 22:47:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.129.52.76 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 22:47:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1d1cb3d6-a2d2-1a3e-5d20-51206524ffbe@FreeBSD.org> From: Ed Schouten Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:47:06 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: sem_timedwait3(..., ..., clockid_t) To: Eric van Gyzen Cc: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 06:47:38 -0000 Hi Eric, 2017-02-15 22:57 GMT+01:00 Eric van Gyzen : > int sem_timedwait3_np(sem_t *sem, const struct timespec *abs_timeout, > clockid_t clock_id); Could we please make the argument order a bit more consistent to clock_nanosleep() (i.e., putting the clockid_t in front of the timespec)? Should we also provide support for the TIMER_ABSTIME flag? -- Ed Schouten Nuxi, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands KvK-nr.: 62051717