From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 30 07:32:30 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A926106566C
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 07:32:30 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net)
Received: from swip.net (mailfe07.c2i.net [212.247.154.194])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF058FC15
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 07:32:28 +0000 (UTC)
X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 []
X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=We2KpSpXIp7zua8olfHtbA6oPL2p8ijoExYxXUNIRvU=
	c=1 sm=1 a=SvYTsOw2Z4kA:10 a=IC3tPse-fb0A:10 a=b3QVEWO9ABQA:10
	a=WQU8e4WWZSUA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=CL8lFSKtTFcA:10
	a=i9M/sDlu2rpZ9XS819oYzg==:17 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8
	a=3rZIGIF3AnKcUkR4-NcA:9 a=5HgKeDz52PopTRKQQQEA:7
	a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=JSCAq1iC0rcA:10
	a=i9M/sDlu2rpZ9XS819oYzg==:117
Received: from [188.126.198.129] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO
	laptop002.hselasky.homeunix.org)
	by mailfe07.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.19)
	with ESMTPA id 172434536; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:32:26 +0200
From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:29:51 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-STABLE; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; )
References: <4E5941D6.9090106@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4E5BEF65.2010502@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E5BEF65.2010502@gmail.com>
X-Face: *nPdTl_}RuAI6^PVpA02T?$%Xa^>@hE0uyUIoiha$pC:9TVgl.Oq, NwSZ4V"|LR.+tj}g5
	%V,x^qOs~mnU3]Gn; cQLv&.N>TrxmSFf+p6(30a/{)KUU!s}w\IhQBj}[g}bj0I3^glmC(
	:AuzV9:.hESm-x4h240C`9=w
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201108300929.51810.hselasky@c2i.net>
Cc: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>, "Hartmann,
	O." <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>,
	"freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 07:32:30 -0000

On Monday 29 August 2011 21:58:29 Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> 27.08.2011 22:13, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> > This website should be brushed up or taken offline!
> > It seems full of vintage stuff from glory days.
> > 
> > http://www.freebsd.org/marketing/os-comparison.html
> 
> I think this one would better look like list of major features with os
> comparison, like:
> 
> = Networking =
>   * IPv6: major support, best stack around.
>   * SCTP: full kernel implementation, still no userland support (i.e.
> ssh doesn't work over sctp by default yet).
> 
> = Data storage =
>   * ZFS: full support, datasets, compression, dedup, other stuff. Linux
> has LVM (?features...) and btrfs (?unstable.. ?features..), Windows has
> dynamic disks since XP (?features).
> 
> = SMP =
>   * (?something about comparing other shedulers with SCHED_ULE), (?some
> rt stuff), (?some comparison with other interesting shedulers, like
> DragonflyBSD and QNX).
> 

And USB. I believe there are significant changes in the USB subsystems which 
those who are making performance benchmarks completely fail to mention.

--HPS