From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 25 00:15:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C22E16A432 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 00:15:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE54D43D92 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 00:15:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045461A3C2B; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 16:14:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2994A533BA; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 19:14:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 19:14:28 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Wojciech Puchar Message-ID: <20051125001428.GA32821@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20051124013438.T8326@chylonia.3miasto.net> <20051124023928.GA13075@xor.obsecurity.org> <20051124140503.A75939@chylonia.3miasto.net> <20051124195930.GA19106@xor.obsecurity.org> <20051125010852.V86615@chylonia.3miasto.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051125010852.V86615@chylonia.3miasto.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: so much clock interrupts?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 00:15:35 -0000 --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 01:09:08AM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >>>No, it's just a consequence of HZ=3D1000 instead of HZ=3D100. I've > >> > >> > >>so why 2000 not 1000? > >> > >>2000 on each processor! > > > >Technical reasons..anyway, 2000 might look like a large number to you, > >but it's really not unless you're on a very slow machine (like a 486). >=20 > i'm asking why it's 2000, not 1000. I don't remember off-hand. It should be apparent if you look at the code. Kris --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDhldjWry0BWjoQKURArkwAJ97C7mW3yhnuhRS0q9orcNKl3KbGACg/i51 kIwFwVNYQ9ta54QZ6g/SQo8= =L9EG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/--