From owner-cvs-all  Fri Jul  5 16:18:47 2002
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 123CA37B400; Fri,  5 Jul 2002 16:18:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (mail-green.research.att.com [135.207.30.103])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7221043E09; Fri,  5 Jul 2002 16:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from fenner@research.att.com)
Received: from alliance.research.att.com (alliance.research.att.com [135.207.26.26])
	by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8AE711E011; Fri,  5 Jul 2002 19:18:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from windsor.research.att.com (windsor.research.att.com [135.207.26.46])
	by alliance.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA29968;
	Fri, 5 Jul 2002 19:18:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Received: (from fenner@localhost)
	by windsor.research.att.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.5) id QAA25811;
	Fri, 5 Jul 2002 16:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200207052318.QAA25811@windsor.research.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
To: peter@wemm.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/tcpdump print-arp.c print-atalk.c print-atm.c print-bgp.c print-bootp.c print-bxxp.c print-cdp.c print-chdlc.c print-cip.c print-cnfp.c print-decnet.c print-dhcp6.c print-domain.c print-dvmrp.c print-egp.c print-esp.c ...
Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 16:18:36 -0700
Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.4c/makemail 2.9d
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <cvs-all.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20cvs-all>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20cvs-all>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


>This makes sense to me.  Do you feel like committing this?

Sure.  For some reason, I thought it was on the vendor branch so was
reluctant to commit it, but now I see I was fooled because I was actually
on the -STABLE branch.  I'll commit it as soon as I can get someone to
reboot my -CURRENT box.

What do you think about the other idea about how "cvs update" should
handle this situation?  (I was so industrious today I even submitted
a PR, http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/40227 .)

  Bill

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message