Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2005 17:22:17 -0500
From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net>
To: "Mikhail Teterin" <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com>
Cc: gnome@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ${PREFIX}/include/nss/nss
Message-ID: <op.syegffpj9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
In-Reply-To: <200510091748.07488@aldan>
References: <200510051413.j95EDBi2038518@blue.virtual-estates.net> <1128814097.47852.10.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <200510091748.07488@aldan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 09 Oct 2005 16:48:06 -0500, Mikhail Teterin
<mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com> wrote:
> On Saturday 08 October 2005 07:28 pm, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> = Yes, but as you pointed out, it will require changes to the
> = NSS-dependent ports (as well as plist changes to security/nss itself).
> = If you want to test all the ports, and submit a complete patch, that
> = would be great.
>
> I seem to vaguely recall you having a cluster capable of quickly
> testing things like this :-)
Not on all Mozilla-based (ie: thunderbird and etc) ports and all ports
that depend on Mozilla-based, his cluster only has GNOME.
> To make things easier, how about creating a symlink:
>
> ${PREFIX}/include/nss/nss -> .
>
> ?
No, it won't be good.
Cheers,
Mezz
> -mi
--
mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.syegffpj9aq2h7>