From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jan 9 21:29:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6293A6ABBF for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 21:29:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: from toco-domains.de (mail.toco-domains.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A21221790 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 21:29:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: from [192.168.1.55] (x5d82943a.dyn.telefonica.de [93.130.148.58]) by toco-domains.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B702E1B22067; Sat, 9 Jan 2016 22:29:39 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Port request: pngout (image compression) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <5620CF6D.70005@toco-domains.de> <5629110E.9040303@toco-domains.de> <5644C68F.6030501@toco-domains.de> Cc: murk.fletcher@gmail.com From: =?UTF-8?Q?Torsten_Z=c3=bchlsdorff?= Message-ID: <5690EC90.5090606@toco-domains.de> Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 12:18:40 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5644C68F.6030501@toco-domains.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 21:29:50 -0000 Hello Murk, >>> Thank you sir -- great stuff! >> >> You're welcome :) >> >> Sadly i'm still waiting for a response addressing the license questions. > > And the waiting is going on. Hopefully i will get a reaction after the > third email. Finally i've got an answer: no. While the deny-statement do not match the description and the way the ports-tree work, i did some more research. You're not the first one requesting this port. I found 2 more requests in the last 3 years and all ask the author because of the unclear license . I am the first who get an answer. So i would say we can't include it sadly. Greetings, Torsten