From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 10 12:46:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F27A1065693 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:46:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from egorenar@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f211.google.com (mail-ew0-f211.google.com [209.85.219.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D398FC1B for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:46:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy3 with SMTP id 3so5602911ewy.13 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:46:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=t1vz08S9GL6JkR8olFOUArF+19g68jlOFWtnY+Ojdwo=; b=WQGI7xZkr5Y3BxkUE4o5VobkQQaIsGm9M2gux8P9vFZFXjqTbZzJmIECpnp9c9Z1f5 icmFZ0toyejf0zs/rT9Ir9kIbwdffmNkF77RXPPE1ohP+ix5gdu9rYP65FgM5ktfaeqb g9FxPVxGbqpkx5ySXNIqMHH4wqosOZMtICsnM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=YPsrIXVi+4BY77s5sUp7vcMaRjuTQG0aXDBFwdpD6kXICo17zqZPgkRj3Z2ag4EmTL vyVz79te7If5/HDCwqFoN48b84Qk10w/VEcGRhbukJG5Fl5aDdePgQBDMj6DsvKuzzlo XxXE7Qyin2vuqAdGa2t849oi1j1Da8YWU2jU4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.8.6 with SMTP id f6mr6430802ebf.93.1265805973836; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:46:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:46:13 +0100 Message-ID: <2d3b7e441002100446k36493e24ldef6d4e335092b7f@mail.gmail.com> From: Alexander Egorenkov To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: net80211 and PPI header X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:46:15 -0000 Is it possible to use PPI header instead of Radiotap header in net80211 ? If yes, how ? Radiotap header is not sufficient for 802.11n mode and PPI header supports 802.11n mode very good.