From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 10:24:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5B416A400 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:24:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C442A13C4A7 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 10:24:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from coolf89ea26645 (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l229kZt5071813; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 01:46:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Message-ID: <00c401c75caf$89ee3370$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "O. Hartmann" , , References: <45E7F09B.7070005@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 01:45:39 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]); Fri, 02 Mar 2007 01:46:36 -0800 (PST) Cc: Subject: Re: (S)ATA performance in FBSD 6.2/7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 10:24:19 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "O. Hartmann" To: ; Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 1:38 AM Subject: (S)ATA performance in FBSD 6.2/7.0 > The last days I tried to figure out why some of my lab's FreeBSD boxes > and also mine at home seem to be outperformed by some Linux setups > around here and I saw something interesting. > blah blah blah deleted > > Before digging into this problem deeper with benchmarks, could anyone > explain why FreeBSD reaches this 33 MB/s limit (sounds like UDMA 33 man mount read section on "async" linux by default mounts async freebsd by default mounts sync you can change FBSD to async then watch your fs scramble during a power failure no big deal, it's only your data. Ted