From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Sep 7 19:27:35 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA27525 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 7 Sep 1997 19:27:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.210.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id TAA27519; Sun, 7 Sep 1997 19:27:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tom by misery.sdf.com with smtp (Exim 1.62 #1) id 0x7tTG-0005VU-00; Sun, 7 Sep 1997 19:22:35 -0700 Date: Sun, 7 Sep 1997 19:22:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius To: Tim Vanderhoek cc: Sean Eric Fagan , jmb@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: spam and the FreeBSD mailing lists In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 7 Sep 1997, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: > > Uh, if we can't reply to them, what are we doing allowing them to ask > > questions? > > Anticipating that they have set the reply-to field. Yes, but if the message should need to be returned by the MTA, it will be returned to the envelope sender (SMTP mail from:) address. Many don't know this, and lose mail because their headers (From: and Reply-To:) are right, but the envelope sender is wrong. Tom