From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 30 16:07:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC242FE7 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 16:07:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f47.google.com (mail-ee0-f47.google.com [74.125.83.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A118FC13 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 16:07:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f47.google.com with SMTP id e51so5751399eek.6 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 08:06:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tfVJlk16GlfQwwD7g0xyXQiDBqQ8PJR60tPCxxoyjlI=; b=jxeCllWU3Tmmdrqp3c9OrIcpS6Q/WVZfNdY9jsB+mCIGN9BSdipi6E80FqcbmCq49E L7YLK3vm/vWhbRDC2uSB4rcw2GBDhre2epUUr3K2paMZJ/8SsI4fUAvPK9OJP8F+pdMh T2bABs7qr0zPXab0HYPa8njHKAV45a9HWDu2JULEd8z99NnMmuRFe+7CcNwk993w5oFb UpFTcllRl1CBKiqrPcjp9wRvpvSuGmywyckDC8V7QkTBV8Hx0zJqYyVq1urSu+f6gLYe tPX5/Ydr0PARwnzuih0fP5BA3C6dZ8p4JPSu+R2g2ONMTy/PMp489wEvS8j654Jt5FyI J4WQ== X-Received: by 10.14.225.4 with SMTP id y4mr102575058eep.6.1356883619729; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 08:06:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w44sm79495746eep.6.2012.12.30.08.06.57 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 30 Dec 2012 08:06:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 16:06:56 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs deprecated Message-ID: <20121230160656.709c409f@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 16:07:08 -0000 On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:18:37 +0000 Chris Rees wrote: > On 30 Dec 2012 12:58, "Wojciech Puchar" > wrote: > > > > do ports have to be updated this way or i can use portsnap as > > today? will > portsnap be continued or is too deprecated? > > Portsnap is staying. And I understand that freebsd-update can be configured to only update the base system source code. If you don't want development branches you can do without subversion altogether.