Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 16:06:56 +0000 From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs deprecated Message-ID: <20121230160656.709c409f@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <CADLo83-wj=SbfOtHGP-Mmn6hYxS=kmPcdjo8oSMvgps2WPmqFg@mail.gmail.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212271016340.35118@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CALeGphzCDoHG6P1qfW3AuAap2ZudA6Yk%2B5zc0X4wBfr9gE1n%2Bw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1212301357280.2953@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CADLo83-wj=SbfOtHGP-Mmn6hYxS=kmPcdjo8oSMvgps2WPmqFg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 13:18:37 +0000 Chris Rees wrote: > On 30 Dec 2012 12:58, "Wojciech Puchar" > <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > > > > do ports have to be updated this way or i can use portsnap as > > today? will > portsnap be continued or is too deprecated? > > Portsnap is staying. And I understand that freebsd-update can be configured to only update the base system source code. If you don't want development branches you can do without subversion altogether.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121230160656.709c409f>