Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:26:25 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: portupgrade -o Message-ID: <46642F21.4080700@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4663D792.4040205@icyb.net.ua> References: <465C550D.1080501@icyb.net.ua> <46611F10.5020008@FreeBSD.org> <4663D792.4040205@icyb.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 02/06/2007 10:41 Sergey Matveychuk said the following: >> Andriy Gapon wrote: > [snip] >>> The problem can be illustrated like follows: >>> $ portupgrade -o audio/portaudio2 portaudio-18.1_2 >>> ... nothing happens ... >>> $ portupgrade -f -o audio/portaudio2 portaudio-18.1_2 >>> ... portaudio-18.1_2 from audio/portaudio is re-installed ... >>> >>> Does anybody else see this ? > [snip] >> It's possible if installed version is greater than a version in origin. >> You can compare two version with the command: >> pkg_version -t version1 version2 > > I am not sure which versions I should compare... > Version of audio/portaudio in ports is 18.1_2, installed version is also > 18.1_2. Version of portaudio2 should not matter in this because it is a > "totally different" port, right ? > Anyway, even if I had the version situation that you suggested I think > it still would be a bug on portupgrade's side because in this case I am > not upgrading any ports at all, I am replacing one port with another. > Or am I missing something ? > I would say it's a feature of portupgrade. It always checks versions by design. -- Dixi. Sem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46642F21.4080700>