From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Jan  7 18:10:03 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id SAA05530
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 7 Jan 1997 18:10:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au (rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au [129.78.129.109])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id SAA05476
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 7 Jan 1997 18:09:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from dawes@localhost) by rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au (8.8.2/8.8.2) id NAA19096; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 13:08:34 +1100 (EST)
From: David Dawes <dawes@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au>
Message-Id: <199701080208.NAA19096@rf900.physics.usyd.edu.au>
Subject: Re: X11R6.3 in 2.2 ?
In-Reply-To: <27801.852684485@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at "Jan 7, 97 04:48:05 pm"
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 13:08:34 +1100 (EST)
Cc: G.Beuermann@Uni-Koeln.DE, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>Whatever the XFree86 Project provides us with - this has always
>been their product and we just bundle the bits they give us.
>rich@freeBSD.org would know more since he's on both teams.

We're planning a beta release in a month or so which will be based on
R6.3.  That's most likely too late for 2.2, and it probably isn't
appropriate to bundle a beta version with 2.2 anyway.

The stock R6.3 release should compile pretty much "out of the box" on
FreeBSD 2.1.6 and later anyway.  R6.3 includes the XFree86 3.2
servers (except for a few minor things).

David