From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Sep 19 18:09:29 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1640716A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 19 Sep 2004 18:09:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mp2.macomnet.net (mp2.macomnet.net [195.128.64.6])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2992443D54
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 19 Sep 2004 18:09:28 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru)
Received-SPF: pass (mp2.macomnet.net: domain of maxim@macomnet.ru designates
	127.0.0.1 as permitted sender) receiver=mp2.macomnet.net; client_ip=127.0.0.1;
	envelope-from=maxim@macomnet.ru;
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mp2.macomnet.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8JI9QKd050597;
	Sun, 19 Sep 2004 22:09:26 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru)
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 22:09:26 +0400 (MSD)
From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
To: Paulo Roberto <nirv199@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040919173733.65859.qmail@web14922.mail.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <20040919220756.G50568@mp2.macomnet.net>
References: <20040919173733.65859.qmail@web14922.mail.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: BRIDGE behaviour
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 18:09:29 -0000

On Sun, 19 Sep 2004, 10:37-0700, Paulo Roberto wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I dont know if this the default behaviour, but anyway:
>
>      BOX 1 (5.3 BETA3)
>     ed0 192.168.1.1 ----------------- HUB
>     xl0 no IPv4 address ------+
>                               |
>                        192.168.1.x
>                           BOX 2
>
> from BOX 2 I cannot ping 192.168.1.1, but I do have access to the
> entire network that ed0 is connected (hub). No firewalls envolved.
>
> Am I lacking any specific layer 2 knowledge? Is it normal behavivour?
> Is it a bug?

sysctl net.inet.ip.check_interface=0

I do not know why we have it on by default.  It's getting annoying.

-- 
Maxim Konovalov